A topic is what the message is based on yet the thesis would be more of the answer, or opinionated answer, to the question brought out from the topic. For instance, the topic of this post would be “Should UCONN be Criticized for Revoking a Scholarship”. I do have a thesis for this topic and it would be, “The University of Connecticut took away a scholarship from a young man who grew up in a foster home, to give a scholarship to 5-star recruit Andre Drummond, they did this 5-days before class starts. The Huskies Athletic Department, should be criticized and I will be not the last but possible the first to expose this injustice,”
Now I would need to build on this thesis and I will by saying:
The defending National Champions took away a scholarship from Michael Bradley to make way for top recruit Andre Drummond. Bradley grew up an orphan and now does not have the money to afford college, the most unfortunate thing for Bradley is that he was revoked of his scholarship FIVE DAYS before classes started. Which is a time period in which most schools already have their limited amount of basketball scholarships. So UCONN has basically shoved this kid back on the street with nowhere to go. Lets not forget that UCONN could have another scholarship available had they not have been caught cheating a couple of years ago, costing them scholarships. What could make this worse? How about over 66% of UCONN fans, according to a poll, agreeing with the UCONN athletic department. What a class act you are Connecticut.
No comments:
Post a Comment